Archive for January, 2010

Bank Tax Misses the Real Bailout Deadbeats in Detroit and DC

Facing rising populist anger over his administration’s billion-dollar bailouts, President Barack Obama proposed a $117 billion tax over the next 12 years on financial companies with assets of more than $50 billion. “We want our money back, and we’re going to get it,” the President said. The President is half right. Taxpayers are going to get their money back from the banks that received bailout money … but don’t expect to see any of the money the Obama administration poured into General Motors and Chrysler at the behest of their union allies. That is where the real losses are coming from.

The TARP program has so far distributed $247 billion to more than 700 banks. Of that, $162 billion in principal and $11 billion in interest and dividends have already been repaid. Except for AIG, almost all banks that received taxpayer money are expected to pay back the American taxpayers in full. As The New York Times reports: “The losses from the bailout fund are expected from money paid to rescue Chrysler and General Motors and the insurance giant American International Group, and from a program to help homeowners avert foreclosures.”

So the real deadbeats that are not giving us “our money back” are not the banks, but the union-backed car companies and failed government mortgage modification programs. But guess what? The White House has chosen not to include the car companies among the institutions that will pay this so called “Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee.” Also exempted are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored entities that helped create the crisis.

The plan also will do nothing to help reform the banking system. Financial regulatory analyst Karen Shaw Petrou tells The Washington Post: “The new big-bank tax is just like charging a nickel sin tax on a half-gallon of cheap liquor — it may make moralists feel good, but it doesn’t do much to stop bad behavior.” Instead of protecting consumers, it will just end up hurting them. Financial services analyst Meredith Whitney tells The New York Times: “The irony is it hurts the weaker banks more than the stronger banks. To think that it won’t come out of consumers and businesses is mistaken.” And banking analyst David Hendler tells Bloomberg: “We remain concerned that this is more evidence of the cynical view of the banking industry which prevails in Washington.”

In sum, this new $117 billion Obama tax will penalize firms that already repaid TARP, and some who never accepted bailout money to begin with, while also making it harder for Americans to get the loans they need to help our economy recover, all while letting the real deadbeats get off scot-free. If the President were serious about making taxpayers whole and restoring confidence in the banking sector, then he should end TARP now.

Print | Comments | Forward

The following is an op-ed by Scott Brown in the Jan 14th Boston Globe. Reprinted in its entirety without permission.

……………………

Scott Brown

Scott Brown

I DIDN’T grow up with all the advantages in life. My mom was on welfare for a time, but I had the support of a loving family and good friends and neighbors. I don’t have all the advantages in this race either, and that’s fine by me. Being the underdog has taught me to work harder, and to appreciate the opportunities of our state and our country.

I’m running because more of our people are unemployed today than ever before. Public debt has reached $12 trillion and counting, and Washington politicians want to borrow trillions more. Terrorists want to strike our country again, and they will do so if we let down our guard. We have fighting forces in two theaters of war, and those men and women need our support.

Like everyone else, I want to see more Americans with good health care coverage. I like what we achieved in Massachusetts. It’s not perfect, but nearly everyone is now covered by a private insurance policy – not a government policy. I hope other states follow our example.

But the healthcare bill under discussion in Washington is not good. It will raise taxes and increase spending. If you are a senior on Medicare, it will lead to a half trillion dollars in cuts to your care. Since we are way ahead of the rest of the country with our own state reforms, we will get nothing in return. My opponent, Martha Coakley, will vote yes on this bill. I will insist we start over.

Failure should be admitted in Washington, and not repeated. With last month’s news that we lost another 85,000 jobs, and with unemployment stuck in the double digits, it’s time to admit that while the $787 billion stimulus had the best of intentions, it failed to create one new job. We shouldn’t pass yet another stimulus that adds to the debt without adding jobs.

My plan for the economy is simple: an across-the-board tax cut – in the tradition of John F. Kennedy – for families and businesses that will increase investment and lead to immediate new job growth. More tax increases will hurt our recovery. That’s why I have taken a no-new-tax pledge.

My opponent will raise taxes.

Amid all our domestic challenges, our nation is still at war with radical Islamic terrorists determined to destroy our way of life. The Christmas bombing attempt on a Northwest Airlines plane is a wake-up call. But instead of being interrogated by military professionals at Guantanamo, the plane bomber has been given taxpayer-funded lawyers in a US courtroom. Because he’s been granted constitutional rights, he’s invoked his privilege to remain silent. Would-be killers should be treated for what they really are: enemies of a country at war, not ordinary criminals.

My opponent would accord such terrorists all the rights our Constitution grants to citizens. I will treat them as enemy combatants who should face military justice.

As this special election draws to a close, the enthusiasm from everyday citizens has been remarkable. To those who have lost faith in their elected leaders, I say: Don’t lose heart. One-party dominance in our state has led to bad decisions and a culture of corruption, but we can restore people’s faith by restoring balance to our political system.

They call me a long shot. But I’m betting that a new day is coming in Massachusetts. I am running in the name of all independent-thinking citizens, whether they are Democrats, Republicans, or unenrolled, to take on one-party rule, and the Beacon Hill bosses, and their machine, and their candidate. With your help, I intend to win.

Scott Brown is a Republican state senator from Wrentham.

…..

-Cnation

Heritage Foundation’s Morning Bell for 1/14/2010

Behind Closed Doors, Unions Win, You Lose

Yesterday, President Barack Obama, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and nine other lawmakers met face-to-face for seven hours to resolve differences between the House and Senate health care bills. At the same time these talks were going on, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka, Service Employees International Union President Andy Stern and United Auto Workers President Ron Gettelfinger met with other Obama administration officials in a separate room in the White House. This all comes after these same labor leaders met personally with Speaker Pelosi yesterday, and after they met face-to-face with President Obama in the White House on Monday. Despite then-candidate Barack Obama’s explicit promises to the American people, absolutely none of these meetings were open to the public or televised on C-SPAN. In fact, Politico reports: “Those involved in the talks sought to keep details of their progress under wraps.”

And just what deals were Big Labor, the leftist majorities in Congress and the Obama administration making behind closed doors? How to pay for President Obama’s likely $1 trillion health care plan without raising taxes on one of the President’s most loyal constituencies: labor unions. Specifically, Big Labor reportedly has struck a deal with health care negotiators to exempt union members from the 40% excise tax on high-priced health insurance premiums. By some estimates, the tax would hit one in four union members. Now Big Labor will get all of the big government health care spending they always wanted, but they will not have to pay for it.

And Obamacare’s Big Labor handouts don’t end there. The legislation also sets aside $5 billion to subsidize the costs of employer health benefits for early retirees. As Heritage fellow James Sherk notes, few nonunion employers, of course, pay pension and health benefits for workers to retire at 55. And then there’s the small business exemption from the employer mandate for businesses with less than 50 employees. At first this applied to all small businesses, but after aggressive lobbying by Big Labor, non-unionized construction businesses were unexempted. Big Labor lobbyists explicitly admitted they wanted to use Obamacare’s job-killing employer mandates as a competitive advantage to drive non-unionized firms out of business.

So where does the White House and Congress propose to regain the revenue lost from exempting unions from the health care excise tax? The people who fund job creation: investors. The Obama administration wants to apply the Medicare payroll tax not just to wages but to capital gains, and for the first time ever, to dividends and other forms of investment income. This tax will hit seniors the hardest since many of them live off their dividend and interest income, in addition to their pension and Social Security checks. But it also hurts us all since high taxes on capital gains, dividends, interest and business income increase the cost of capital, thus depressing investment at the very time the economy needs new investment to grow and create jobs.

Big Labor’s high wages and inflexible work rules have already bankrupted our nation’s once proud automobile industry. Across the country, their early retirement and exorbitant pensions are bankrupting states. The health insurance excise tax was once the signature health care spending cost cutter of Obama’s entire health care plan. Now it has been gutted at the altar of Big Labor power. The big loser in all of these cases is you, the American taxpayer.
Print | Comments | Forward

Liz Cheney’s ‘Keep America Safe’ Latest Video

Right on the money:

Keep America Safe: “100 Hours” from Keep America Safe on Vimeo.

…..

-Cnation

Coakley witnesses campaign staffer assault reporter, does nothing

This says as much or more about the character of the liberal senatorial candidate from Massachusetts, Martha Coakley – who, incidentally, is the Massachusetts Attorney General - than anything else that could be proven of her to date.

Coakley actually stood right there and witnessed a reporter from the Weekly Standard being assaulted by a campaign staffer, and did absolutely nothing about it.

Assault and battery is a crime. Even in Massachusetts. Martha Coakley is Massachusetts’ cheif law enforcement officer. Are you beginning to understand the problem we have here?

It is being reported by Ed Morrissey at Hot Air that the assailant may be a man by the name of Michael Meehan of Blue Line Strategic Communications, “…who has worked for John Kerry, Maria Cantwell, and was sent to Massachusetts by the DSCC to handle “messaging” for Coakley.”

Like seemingly everyone else in this once semi-respectable party, Coakley is a disgrace, and the good people of Massachusetts, ragardless of political affiliation, should be embarrassed and ashamed to have this woman claiming to represent them.

Hot Air has the story, along with a video and pictures of the assault, and a good still photo of the assailant.

U.S. senatorial candidate and current Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley looks on as staffer assaults reporter.

U.S. senatorial candidate and current Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley looks on as staffer assaults reporter.

-Cnation

Via the Boston Globe:

A major national union supporting Democrat Martha Coakley is taking out a massive TV ad buy that slams her Republican rival, Scott Brown, for his positions on abortion and climate change.

The ad taken out by the Service Employees International Union, will begin airing statewide tomorrow. The buy size is $685,000, one of the largest of the election.

“Before you vote for Senate, here’s a few things you should know about Scott Brown,” says a narrator in the 30-second spot. The narrator then says he “has repeatedly opposed a woman’s right to choose” and he “expresses skepticism that climate change is being caused by humans.”

“No wonder Brown’s campaign is being supported by the same extremist group that backs Sarah Palin,” the narrator says. “Martha Coakley for Senate. Massachusetts values.”

This is $685,000 of SEIU money (probably stimulus money) that will be funding television ads attacking Scott Brown during this final week before the election.

This Coakley woman is a nasty. nasty piece of work and absolutely must be stopped before she reaches the senate and becomes another reliable far-left vote. Scott Brown is the man who can stop her, who can stop Obamacare, and break the Dem’s stranglehold on the senate.

Please donate whatever you can, even if only just a few bucks.

…..

Here’s Scott Brown with Greta Van Susteren last night. Good interview, worth a watch to get an idea of who Scott Brown is and where he stands.

…..

-Cnation

FOR THE WEEK OF January 11, 2010

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hispanic Caucus Considering Health Care Flip-Flop As Congressional leaders return to Washington to negotiate a final health care bill, immigration-related differences between the House and Senate versions may be forcing the pro-amnesty Congressional Hispanic Caucus to reconsider its support for health care reform.Read the full article

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

New Jersey Lawmakers Push to Grant Tuition Breaks for Illegal Aliens Lawmakers in New Jersey are poised to give in-state tuition to illegal aliens following a recent flurry of activity from pro-amnesty groups. The special interest groups have launched an eleventh-hour attempt to grant in-state tuition to illegal aliens before Governor Corzine leaves office this month. The outgoing governor supports the long-stalled legislation and has said it is one he would “put high on the agenda.” Corzine lost his re-election bid to Gov.-elect Christie, who opposes the idea and has stated that only lawful taxpayers deserve a tuition break because they help subsidize in-state tuitions. Id. The bill, which advocates have been pushing for eight years, passed state Senate and Assembly committees last week. However, a vote on the controversial legislation scheduled for last week was postponed by state Senators, which could indicate the bill lacks the votes needed to pass. Both the Senate and the Assembly will take up the bill Monday, which is the last day of the legislative session. Id.Read the full article

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Liberal Think Tank Claims Amnesty Would Benefit Economy Last week, the Center for American Progress (CAP) a well-known liberal think tank headed by John Podesta, former chief of staff to President Clinton released a report claiming that amnesty would boost the U.S. economy. The report, entitled “Raising the Floor for American Workers: The Economic Benefits of Comprehensive Immigration Reform” is the latest attempt by amnesty supporters to persuade Americans to support legalizing millions of illegal aliens currently in the U.S. Authored by a professor of Chicana and Chicano studies at UCLA, Dr. Raúl Hinojosa-Ojeda, the report argues that granting amnesty to the more than 11 million illegal aliens currently residing in the United States would actually benefit the economy.Read the full article

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

As Introduction of Senate Amnesty Bill Looms, McCain and Graham Face Repercussions at Home Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) are expected to introduce an immigration bill in the U.S. Senate early this year. Pro-amnesty advocates are urging the Senate Judiciary Committee to take up the issue by February, and just last week a Schumer spokesman stated, “We’ve said we can have something that can be ready to go whenever the president chooses, as soon as early this year.”Read the full article

Web Bug from http://www.fairus.org/site/PixelServer?j=etcvIDYGYspJ8CYqHnBG6Q..

Will Amnesty Help the Economy?

podcast Watch FAIR’s Bob Dane discuss a new study that says amnesty will help the economy.

support FAIR

New Research from FAIR

Summary of Rep. Gutierrez’s Mass Amnesty Bill January 2010 How the Senate Health Care Bill Impacts Immigration December 2009 English Learners and Immigration: A Case Study of Prince George’s County, Maryland November 2009 The Costs of Illegal Immigration to Marylanders November 2009 Backsliding on National Security: The Immigration Connection September 2009 The Sinking Lifeboat: Uncontrolled Immigration and the U.S. Health Care System in 2009 September 2009 Health Care Reform Bill to Cover Illegal Aliens (pdf) August 2009

Takeaction
fairdebate
Visit the best immigration news blog on the web… stein
share facebook twitter

 

Morning Bell: $787 Billion in Stimulus, Zero Jobs “Created or Saved”

Heritage Foundation’s Morning Bell: $787 Billion in Stimulus, Zero Jobs “Created or Saved”

On February 11th, President Barack Obama stood on a windy hilltop in front of a dusty construction site in Fairfax County, Virginia, and promised the American people: “Here in Virginia, my plan will create or save almost 100,000 jobs, doing work at sites just like this one.” Standing alongside current Democratic National Committee Chairman and former-Gov. Tim Kaine, the President continued: “Where we’re standing, that could mean hundreds of construction jobs. And the benefits of jobs we create directly will multiply across the economy.” Eleven months later, none of those promised jobs have been “created or saved.” In fact, the Obama administration quietly announced last week that they were dropping the fraudulent “saved or created” terminology altogether.

The failure of Obama’s $787 billion stimulus is particularly acute in Virginia where, as Heritage fellow Ron Utt has documented, despite $695 million in allocated infrastructure funding, only 16% of designated projects had begun. House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman James Oberstar (D-MN) even publicly complained about Virginia’s slow transportation spending, writing to Gov. Kaine: “your state ranks last among all states [51 out of 51, including the District of Columbia], based on an analysis of the percentage of Recovery Act highway formula funds put out to bid, under contract and under way.”

But even where infrastructure spending has been spent, the hard evidence shows that there has not been any positive effect on unemployment. According to an Associated Press analysis reviewed by independent economists at five universities, the $20 billion spent nationwide on infrastructure so far “has had no effect on local unemployment rates.” And this was just the most recent embarrassing headline for the White House’s signature economic policy. Since the first reporting deadline in October, newspapers and other media outlets across the country have identified 94,341 fake jobs reported by the Obama administration as jobs “created or saved” by the stimulus. After the Government Accountability Office issued a report finding “significant reporting and processing problems that need to be addressed,” Obama administration spokesman Ed Pound offered this defense of the Obama administration’s jobs numbers: “Who knows, man, who really knows.”

Now Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag issued a little-noticed memo last month ending the “saved or created” metric and instead directing agencies to count only jobs “funded” by stimulus dollars. But as Harvard University labor economist Lawrence Katz tells ProPublica, this is not really an improvement: “I just think it’s a silly exercise.” Instead Katz says a more accurate way to account for the effect of the stimulus is to look at the unemployment numbers put out by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

That is a great idea. The latest BLS report issued last Friday found that the U.S. economy dropped 85,000 jobs in December, bringing the jobs lost total to 2.7 million since the stimulus was passed and 3.4 million since Obama became President. In contrast, the President’s White House Council of Economic Advisers had promised total employment of at least 138.6 million by 2010. Actual employment as of December was reported to be 130.9 million, leaving the Obama jobs deficit at 7.7 million.

The problem with infrastructure spending as stimulus, and really government spending as stimulus, is that Congress does not have a vault of money waiting to be distributed. Every dollar Congress injects into the economy must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy. No new spending power is created. It is merely redistributed from one group of people to another. Businesses are telling pollsters that among the biggest reasons they are not creating jobs is the prospect of new tax and regulatory burdens. A better solution to reduce unemployment is to simplify and reduce the barriers to business success.

Print | Comments | Forward

RECENT ENTRIES

Baby, It’s Cold Outside

Trumka Talks Tough, But Will Obama Listen?

Prop. 8 Not A Show Trial Yet

Friends and Foes of Educational Opportunity

What Terrorism, Job Losses, and Health Care Have in Common

QUICK HITS

According to a new report from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services, the health bill passed by the Senate on Christmas Eve will increase national health spending by $222 billion over current law.

The latest CBS News poll shows that just 36% of Americans approve of President Obama’s handling of health care, while 54% disapprove.

According to Rasmussen Reports, 58% of voters disapprove of the Obama administration’s bailout of GM and Chrysler, and 56% disapprove of bailing-out banks and other financial institutions.

Twenty Democratic House members, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) along with related staff took a tax-payer funded trip to the failed Copenhagen Climate Summit, including the use of three military jets: two 737s and a Gulfstream Five.

Seeking to repair Venezuela’s floundering economy, strongman Hugo Chavez threw his country into chaos by devaluing the Bolivar by half.

Share Today’s Morning Bell
Facebook Facebook Myspace Myspace
Digg Icon Digg Linkdin Linkdin
Twitter Twitter

Can Scott Brown Stop Obamacare?

U.S. Senate Candidate Scott Brown

U.S. Senate Candidate Scott Brown

“With all due respect, it’s not the Kennedys’ seat, It’s not the Democrats’ seat. It’s the people’s seat.’’

On January 19, Massachusetts will hold a special election to fill the senate seat vacated by the recently departed Ted Kennedy. Conventional wisdom says the seat will go to a democrat in this most liberal of northeastern states, but these are not conventional times; Republican Scott Brown is mounting a very serious challenge for this seat and actually has a very legitimate shot at winning it.

The Massachusetts Democrats are nervous, and with good reason: Scott Brown, currently a state senator, is the real deal, and has gained a tremendous amount of momentum and support over the past couple of weeks. And since his election to the United States senate would break the Dem’s critical 60-seat filibuster-proof supermajority, his campaign has gained national interest due to its high-stakes nature and the potential that it carries to stop the Obama machine dead in its tracks. Brown has stated in no uncertain terms that if seated in time, he will absolutely vote against Obamacare, thereby killing it in the Senate unless another Republican (ie Snowe, Collins) crosses over.

This morning, Scott Brown’s campaign started a drive to raise $500,000 in one day. They hit that number right around 4pm. They then raised the goal to $750,000 and reached it by 6:30pm.

By midnight, the Scott Brown campaign had raised $1,303,302.50!

However, the fight promises to get intense in this final week before the election. The anti-Brown attack ads have already started in earnest on both television and radio, the DNC has sent their National Press Secretary Hari Sevugan to ‘help out’ – and apparently ‘helping out’ means bringing Sarah Palin’s name inexplicably into the fray – and Bill Clinton himself is set to campaign for Coakley.

Scott Brown needs our support. He can win this thing, break the Democrat supermajority, and stop the Obamacare debacle.

Donate Here

I’ll leave you with what I feel was one of the highlights of this evening’s debate between Brown and Coakley:

…..

-Cnation

Morning Bell: Bookmark It…Foundry.org

Bookmark It – foundry.org

We would like to take this opportunity to introduce you to our redesigned blog, The Foundry, now available at www.foundry.org. The Foundry is the conservative policy news blog that offers the latest and greatest from The Heritage Foundation. Every day, Heritage experts and analysts provide insight into the day’s news, using well-crafted research, data, charts and analysis. You’ll also find commentary on breaking news, national policy, congressional events and the White House.

If you’ve been a regular reader of The Foundry, you know about the great content we have to offer. Based on feedback from loyal readers like you, we’ve made it easier to navigate the site and interact with The Heritage Foundation. On the right side of the page, you’ll now be able to get to our Facebook or Twitter pages in one click, where you can become a fan or follower, interact with other likeminded readers, participate in live online events, share our articles with friends, and send us your feedback. You can browse our Flickr photo gallery and see the exciting events and personalities that Heritage welcomes daily. You can subscribe for our e-newsletters or our RSS feed, get the entire blog delivered to you daily on your Kindle, and of course, you can donate and become a Heritage member and help support the growing conservative renaissance.

To make navigation easier, we’ve given you the ability to search by your favorite author or analyst and see our most popular, commented on, and linked-to articles so you never miss a thing. Interested in a particular policy area? Now you can click on the relevant Leadership for America Initiative to see all of our posts in that particular subject area. You can also watch streaming videos on site or visit our newly redesigned YouTube channel, which is home to hundreds of videos on a wide range of topics. We’ll post our favorite videos on The Foundry, and whenever a Heritage analyst or expert is on television, we’ll share their broadcast insights with you immediately. The Foundry is your one-stop shop.

There is also a new and exciting edition to The Foundry called Foundry Features, which gives you quick access to our latest special features and content. Want to get plugged into the latest on health care reform or read our popular Morning Bell e-newsletter? They’re only a click away. In fact, joining 130,000 other Americans and getting the Morning Bell delivered to your mailbox has never been easier.

Want to go behind-the-scenes and hear from the extraordinary guests who visit Heritage every week? Check out our In The Green Room weekly video feature. Outside the Beltway explores how conservatism affects local communities and states. In Their Own Words gives newsmakers an opportunity to speak for themselves and our Guest Bloggers offers insights directly from congressional leaders and policy experts. And if you’re a Capitol Hill junkie, you’ll love The Cloakroom, which gives you a look at what legislative issues Congress will be addressing in the coming week.

We’ll also share with you some of our favorite videos and tweets, whether they are from @Heritage or another commentator on Twitter. And it’s easier than ever to share your favorite posts with your friends, family and colleagues by using the one-click “Tweet This” option on every post or by clicking on the Facebook icon next to the author’s name.

As always, we want to hear from you. We encourage all of our members, guests and readers to comment on each and every post on The Foundry. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. That means we should all remember to be respectful of each other. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone’s intention visiting this site.

Finally, we want to thank you. Without you, The Heritage Foundation would not be where it is today. We have more than 580,000 members and growing. We have more than 105,000 Facebook fans and growing. We have more than 32,000 people following us on Twitter and growing. And more than 130,000 subscribe to the Morning Bell every day, making it one of the most widely read, influential and premiere e-newsletters in Washington.

We continue to grow because of you. Thank you for continuing to visit The Foundry and thank you for supporting The Heritage Foundation. We look forward to seeing you again shortly. And keep an eye out for a newly designed Heritage.org…coming soon.

Print | Comments | Forward

RECENT ENTRIES

Tweet of the Week: Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ)

The Cloakroom: January 11-15

The Few Standing Between Current Law and Tax Payer Funded Abortion

Obama’s Green Jobs Plan Will Do More Harm Than Good

Something Fishy in the Ministry of Defense

QUICK HITS

Nearly three years after Congress House Speaker Nancy Pelosi promised to “drain the swamp,” no member of Congress has been punished for wrongdoing.

Regulators from around the U.S., including Kansas, Pennsylvania, Florida and California, are calling on the EPA to go slow with its greenhouse-gas emission rules, warning that the administration’s approach could overwhelm them with paperwork and delay construction projects.

Conservatives are collecting signatures for a ballot initiative that would suspend California’s cap-and-trade scheme until their unemployment rate falls below 5.5%.

According to an analysis by the Associated Press, reviewed by independent economists at five universities, the surge in spending on roads and bridges from President Barack Obama’s first economic stimulus plan has had no effect on local unemployment.

In today’s New York Times, Reagan administration Attorney General Edwin Meese III, explains how the judge presiding over California’s same-sex marriage Proposition 8 trial, is stacking the deck against supporters of traditional marriage.

Share Today’s Morning Bell
Facebook Facebook Myspace Myspace
Digg Icon Digg Linkdin Linkdin
Twitter Twitter