In response to this story by AP ‘reporter’ Christina Hoag, in which she rails against alleged racist incidents at college campuses but fails to mention that the perpetrators of at least two of them were members of the minority groups themselves:

—–

The author of this reprehensible piece of ‘journalism’, Christina Hoag, should be ashamed of herself for her blatant and intentional - since there’s no way she couldn’t know the whole story - misrepresentation of the types of situations she claims to be reporting on. In almost all cases, the offending item (noose/swastika/spray-painted racial slur, etc…) has been shown to have been placed by a member of the target minority themselves as a way to garner sympathy for their ‘plight’.

Ms. Hoag won’t tell you, for example, that the UC San Diego noose was planted by a (unspecified) minority female, while the ‘compton cookout‘ was organized by a black man.

Why? Because it won’t fit the narrative of Hoag and her ilk that the white man is the biggest single perpetrator of racism among us.

The fact, glaringly obvious to anyone capable of honest analysis, is that nothing is further from the truth.

The overwhelming majority of racism in this country emanates from the very people who cry about it the loudest….who also happen to be the very same people who view every person and every situation in terms of race. It’s always race first. Before character. Before merit. Before accomplishment.

It is a disgraceful situation that will continue to tear our country apart unless the people - you know, us -  and our elected representatives develop the spine to say ‘No More”. And, of course, until responsible news organizations throw agenda-driven hacks like Ms. Hoag out onto the street where they belong.

…..

-Cnation

That’s right, the hypocrites on the left - you know, the same ones who vehemently attacked Don Imus, Trent Lott, George Allen, David Howard and countless others of opposing political viewpoints for what they felt were “racially insensitive” remarks - are giving a pass to Senate majority leader Harry Reid after certain comments Reidd made about Obama during the 2008 presidential race came to light today.

According to Reid, Obama would score points with voters for his “light skin” and for having “…no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”.

While this is really no surprise coming from anyone on the left considering the left’s well-established inability to see beyond ones race, gender, and sexual preference, it is a shocker to hear what race hustler extraordanaire Al Sharpton had to say about it:

“While there is no question that Senator Reid did not select the best word choice in this instance, these comments should not distract America from its continued focus on securing healthcare or creating jobs for its people,”

Translation - “let’s not come down on Harry when he’s in the middle of trying to give the black community lots of free shit…”

Has there ever been a bigger, more pathetic bunch of lying, brown-nosing, unprincipled creeps in American history than the current crop of so-called Democrats?

Hot Air has more

…..

-Cnation

From the Baltimore Sun:

A federal judge suggested Monday that he might restrict the scope of a first-of-its kind lawsuit filed by the city of Baltimore against mortgage giant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

The city accuses Wells Fargo of engaging in illegal “reverse redlining” — targeting black neighborhoods for bad loans that resulted in mass foreclosures. The resulting drain on city services cost tens of millions of dollars, the lawsuit alleges.

Lawyers for Wells Fargo filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit in September, arguing that the city lacked standing to file the complaint. Baltimore was the first municipality to sue a lender in the wake of the subprime mortgage crisis. Similar lawsuits were later filed in Cleveland and Birmingham, Ala., but those complaints have been dismissed by federal judges.

Ok, it’s like this: ACORN, other racial grievance groups, and assorted race hustlers pressure banks both directly and through the federal government to provide mortgages to people who absolutely, no-freakin’-way-in-hell would ever have qualified for them on their own and who clearly would have no way of paying them back. This is a fact. Then, in what must have been a shock to everyone, said loan recipients default on their mortgages and the homes go into foreclosure. Then, the city of Baltimore sues the mortgage lender for racially motivated criminal activity.

So, the banks are racist for not providing loans to people who aren’t credit-worthy, then they’re racist for providing loans to people who aren’t credit-worthy.

Does the ‘black community’ really not understand why people are hesitant to do business in/with it? Really?

A rational man might conclude that the only winning move would be not to play, and he would be right.

…..

More from Michelle Malkin

…..

-Cnation